The only reason Microsoft did the recent price drops is because consumers are starting to realize (and TALKING about it) that they are getting ripped off. If you ask me, the Pro/Premium isn't even worth $200, much less $300.
The list is to PROVE that the PS3, with the accessories, is actually about $100 cheaper.
Here's a list I made of the comparisons:
Xbox 360:
Console 60 GB-$300
1 extra controller-$60
Recharge for Controller-$30 P& C, $40 Quick Charge
1 new game-$60
Wireless adapter- $100 (you don't really need this, so I'm subtracting it from the total)
Xbox LIVE- $60
Wireless Headset-$60
Total- $670 (no wireless adapter, P & C)
--------------------------------------
Playstation 3:
Console 80GB- $400
1 extra controller- $55
1 new game- $60 {Look at what you're getting (it's all built in)
Playstation Network, 5 years- $0
Wireless Adapter- built in
Wireless Headset- $50
Total- $565
I say 5 years because that's how long most people will keep their console. And BTW, another reason to get a PS3 is that it will last, and I heard there's a new Xbox coming out in 4-5years. Sony even said that they made the PS3 to last a decade. The multi-platform games are using about 25% of the PS3's graphical potential. So there's lots of wiggle room in the future. On the other hand, most multiplatform games are using about 98% of it's potential. And the look only slightly inferior on the PS3, if not much at all. And PS3 has a very good reliability rate: only 0.2% failure rate (note the decimal), while Xbox 360's have a 30% reliability rate. So, for every 1000 of both consoles produced, 2 PS3's are defective, whilst about 330 Xbox 360's are defective. The numbers speak for themselves.
Many game developers have openly stated that in the near future, they will use the PS3 as a lead developing platform, then port the games to the 360. It's just that right now, developers haven't got used to the PS3's very complex Cell Broadband Engine's complex and unique structure.
--------------------------------------
Also, many Xbox fanboys will say "Sure, LIVE is 60 bucks a year, but you get what you pay for." Isn't this like a Sony fanboy saying "Sure, it's 100 bucks more, but that is *pretty much* all you pay for, except for games?" And yeah, soon, Xbox fanboys will just troll on about some other lame-a** excuse on why the PS3 sucks. Like they say: If a person hates you, it's only cuz they want to be more like you. (replace person with thing, and you with something(else)
Edit: To Luigi below me. Yes. the Blu Ray player is THAT important. At least it is for older gamers that are serious home theater audiophiles like myself. The PS3 is the only multi-media, next gen console on the market right now, and that's the bottom line.
Good thing I bough a PS3 instead of an Xbox (must have been on the internet too long if Im making typos like that). But is the Blue Ray player THAT important to you?
edit:
Oh.... Gawd and here I am with my lame DVD player when I could be buying me some BlooRais . When did I fall so behind? -worries-
i thoght the xbox 360 wan't bad but like you I got a ps3 and now thinking the same thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment