skip to main |
skip to sidebar
May be...
i have had it for 7 years and havent played it oncei beat that game...it was good the story was weird but the game was good!I've never heard of that game, but Tomb Raider: Legend and Anniversary are really good action/adventure games for PS2.
Check them out sometime.
Happy gaming~
- §їlεйcε•ậмїḍsŧ•¢ĥåǿ§I loved both 1 and 2 ! I stumble upon a cool adventure game that I got for like $14 bucks called "Beyond Good And Evil" ! Awesome game that was overlooked !
May be...
i have heard of many having this problem i was just wondering if they were going to fix it by making an online update or something. If not i was going to get my money back. if there will be, how long will it take til its accessible?um iPwn its not a PS3 problem its a game problem.
But yea They are realeasing a patch to fix it but not everyone is having that problem. I havent I have play both online and offline.I have experienced the same problem several times with my Madden 09 for PS3. There is a patch available. If your system is connected on line, the next time you try to play, you will be directed to download update 1.1. I've downloaded it and it's been better but the last game froze up again. It was the first time in three games. I know that doesn't sound so great but it's better than it was. I'm sure they (EA) will continue to update the patch until the get it right. Hope this helps.I have the same problem. I played 6 games yesterday and it froze up all 6 times. Very frustrating!!! EA says they are working on it and it is not just a PS3 problem. Also happening to 360 owners.Poor playstation, it can't even do what it's designed for...I just came across a site that sends you a Playstation 3 for free! I'm ordering mine right now.
May be...
i'll be installing yellow dog linux on my ps3 soon and was wondering if this will effect any ps3 firmware updates or anything like that.No you are fine Sony design the PS3 firmware to install other OSes. Good Luckno
May be...
I know that GTA IV is very young & there is still al least a couple of years that it will very "hot," but I can't help but think about the future. I think everything in GTA IV is great... so what I am looking forward to is the location of GTA V.
I have read many forums & websites that say that the next GTA should take place in Vice City... but there is really not that much crime in Miami anymore... so it wouldn't make sence. Other people say it should be in some wierd places like Bejing, India, Africa, Mexico City, Chicago & many others. I don't think a GTA game should be made in a "nice looking" just because its looks it should have a high crime rate. Mexico City does have a very high crime rate but it is unappealing & Chicago is where Saint's Row take splace so it wouldn't be a good idea.
So my personal opionion is that the next GTA should take place in... well Liberty City again. It just seems like the most resonable idea... I would love to have San Andreas back but it's just too big with a lot of "dead space" if they can make a more interactive San Andreas I would completly be happy with it. But we will just have to wait & see. If a new city is created Atlanta or New Orleans would be the two cities that come to my mind.
So what city do guys wish the next GTA took place in???GTA V should be set in Liberty City, because it's now a tradition for the "numbered" games to be set there.
But in the meantime, they should explore some new locations. Let's have a version set in London in the 1960s - loads of James Bond, Beatles, and Michael Caine references, and just think of the music, weapons and cars they could include.
Another good one for me would be Germany in the Nazi era, but I don't think that would fly somehow, it would just be too much of a hot potato for them.
What they definitely don't need is yet another game set in an American city in the 1980s/90s/00s, as that's just too familiar now. They should keep the Liberty City tradition, and it would even be nice to go back to Vice City some day but please, let's leave it at that.I don't want to see Liberty City again, for now anyway. I could see Vice City being the next place. It's a very small city overall, and I think that it getting a full makeover would be a great thing. San Andreas is a huge city and I think it would take a lot of time to fully redo that city so Vice City is a good choice.JT gave a nice idea - Vice City of nowadays. If they can manage to fit SA, it would be even better. Huge territories to explore, tons of vehicles, interesting missions. But that must be San Andreas of nowadays too.I think a modern day Vice City it may not hav e as much crime rate but they can add it so a new vice city like in gta 4 a new liberty city it will be goodId like to see it in Chicago. The El would make a nice addition. Plus wouldnt it be fun having 4 stars and recreating the Blues Brothers chase scene under the El.How about a GTA game that is set in like the 1920s? When organized crime was huge. But for GTA V I would say Liberty City.just because a city has a high crime rate doesnt mean its a good setting for a GTA gameSan andreas was released in 2004 and was set in 1992.
GTA 4 and GTA 3 were the only games set "now" when they came out.
In addition the crime rates in the game are not comparable to the real life crime rates at all, GTA does not examine real life and take the crime rates from there and then.
I think it should be in Liberty City. I hear people just naming famous cities like Chicago, London and ridiculous places like Delhi and when i picture it it isnt GTA its just another of these knock off GTa games like Saints Row.
Making GTA in Liberty City AGAIN would be a huge misake, what can they add to it? They can make it bigger and more detailed but it will just feel like the same game AGAIN. They should do either Vice City or the San Andreas area again. They still have that feel of GTA
Look back at how different the original Liberty City is to the new one.
THey barely kept anything the same. They reinvented the whole place.
Now see how they could remake Vice City in the 80s with the whole neon 80s feel but with a bigger, more detailed and most importantly different map. The same for San Andreas, imagine a next gen recreation of Clifornia and Nevada along with the desert and forests in between.
May be...
whats the features? thanksNew core configuration this fall with 80GB hard drive. Same as the current 40GB SKU with twice the hard drive. This will also include a DualShock 3 controller..So basically its just an 40gb with 80gb hard drive..Core 80GB Has:
80GB HDD
2 USB Ports
Matt Silver Trim
Built in WiFi
Recharable Wireless Controller
PSOne compatibility
Core 80 GB Has Not:
4 USB Ports
Flash Card Readers
Chrome Trim
PS2 compatibilityhas 80 Grub Babies, but you only get about 74 of them because of the operating system Crows of Death, the older model has only 40 Grub Babies, in the land before time the PS Triple had 60 Grub Babies......and a beard
May be...
i have the 80 gig ps3 and online i've read that it has backwards compatibility but its software emulation. What does that mean? Does it mean that if i were to upgrade my hard drive to a bigger one that it will backwards compatibility? i really would like the answer to this.The backwards compatibility on the PS3 is controlled by the firmware. It's not stored on the hard drive, but stored on the motherboard within flash memory.
Replacing the hard drive won't remove backwards compatibility since the hard drive isn't needed for it, and installing a new hard drive won't copy any of the software needed for backwards compatibility..the hard drive has NOTHING to do with backwards compatibility. so changing the hard drive in a system that has it will not change compatibility. upgrading the hard drive on a 40GB that has no backward compatibility will not change the compatibility.Emulation means basically that it will make one device act like another, in this case, the PS3 like a PS2. Changing the HDD will not affect your ability to do this. As pointed out by another answerer pointed out, it is part of the Firmware, not stored on the HDD.No, just make sure you keep the original HDD in case you have to send it in.
Otherwise Sony encourages you since its in the manual how to lolchanging the hdd will do nothing to the backwards compatibility because backwards compatibility is stored on flash memory on the motherboard
May be...
i heard it mighti have a 60gb ps3 and upgraded it to 250gb bout 2 months ago and its didnt slow mine down but i have notice that it runs a lil faster just a tad bit but im sure hdd really dont make ur ps3 fasterI upgraded my PS3 to a 250gb and it doesn't slow it down at all. It won't slow down yours.
Here is a 250gb Hard Drive: http://www.compuplus.com/i-Toshiba-MK255...
How to Install: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-B1mQ21XX...I did the same thing Alex did and mine works fine, too. Just make sure it's a SATA 2.5 inch (laptop type) hard drive and that you've got a really good small fillips head screwdriver and you'll be fine.
I recommend you get a 250gig drive because it's not that much more expensive for the extra capacity. If you can't find one in a store (I got mine at Best Buy) try a mail order place like New Egg or Tiger Direct.
It shouldn't slow your PS3 down at all ! Just remember to reformat your hard disk before using it in your PS3 !
For a complete guide to upgrading your PS3 HDD click the link !
http://www.kotaku.com.au/games/2007/11/u...i added a 160gb hdd and its never been faster.how about google that